On 07/28/2016 04:37 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> I did a similar thing in the series introducing the AST2400 SoC, and
> Peter had a comment on the approach[1]:
>
> What we do now is not let the user override the cpu model at all;
> presumably this SoC only ever has an ARM926 and it doesn't
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 18:46 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> It will be easier to specify a different cpu for other soc derived
> from the ast2400 soc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater
> ---
> hw/arm/ast2400.c | 8 +++-
> hw/arm/palmetto-bmc.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+
It will be easier to specify a different cpu for other soc derived
from the ast2400 soc.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater
---
hw/arm/ast2400.c | 8 +++-
hw/arm/palmetto-bmc.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/arm/ast2400.c b/hw/arm/ast2400.c
index fa
