On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 17.07.2011 11:03, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Andreas Färber
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 15.07.2011 um 21:38 schrieb Stefan Weil:
Commit 953ffe0f935f40c0d6061d69e76e0339393b54f8
introduced FMT_pid whi
Am 17.07.2011 11:03, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Andreas Färber
wrote:
Am 15.07.2011 um 21:38 schrieb Stefan Weil:
Commit 953ffe0f935f40c0d6061d69e76e0339393b54f8
introduced FMT_pid which is wrong for w32 and w64 getpid():
those getpid() implementations always return
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 15.07.2011 um 21:38 schrieb Stefan Weil:
>
>> Commit 953ffe0f935f40c0d6061d69e76e0339393b54f8
>> introduced FMT_pid which is wrong for w32 and w64 getpid():
>> those getpid() implementations always return an int value.
This is not in li
Am 15.07.2011 um 21:38 schrieb Stefan Weil:
Commit 953ffe0f935f40c0d6061d69e76e0339393b54f8
introduced FMT_pid which is wrong for w32 and w64 getpid():
those getpid() implementations always return an int value.
Where is __int64 FMT_pid used then if not for the returned pid?
Andreas
Signed-
Commit 953ffe0f935f40c0d6061d69e76e0339393b54f8
introduced FMT_pid which is wrong for w32 and w64 getpid():
those getpid() implementations always return an int value.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
---
os-win32.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/os-win32.c b/