On Mon, 09/25 13:50, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:30:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Mon, 09/25 13:23, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:09:22PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 09/22 16:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > > When gcontext is used with iothread, the
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:30:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 09/25 13:23, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:09:22PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > On Fri, 09/22 16:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > When gcontext is used with iothread, the context will be destroyed
> > > > during iothr
On Mon, 09/25 13:23, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:09:22PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Fri, 09/22 16:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > When gcontext is used with iothread, the context will be destroyed
> > > during iothread_stop(). That's not good since sometimes we would like
> > > to k
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:09:22PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, 09/22 16:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> > When gcontext is used with iothread, the context will be destroyed
> > during iothread_stop(). That's not good since sometimes we would like
> > to keep the resources until iothread is destroyed,
On Fri, 09/22 16:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> When gcontext is used with iothread, the context will be destroyed
> during iothread_stop(). That's not good since sometimes we would like
> to keep the resources until iothread is destroyed, but we may want to
> stop the thread before that point.
Would be n
When gcontext is used with iothread, the context will be destroyed
during iothread_stop(). That's not good since sometimes we would like
to keep the resources until iothread is destroyed, but we may want to
stop the thread before that point.
Delay the destruction of gcontext to iothread finalize.
