On 11 May 2013 06:09, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> Also, technically speaking get_system_memory() is never the
>> right answer, though in practice it's good enough for our
>> purposes. (returning get_system_memory() would allow a bus
>> master D
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 May 2013 15:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> From: Avi Kivity
>>
>> Use the new iommu support in the memory core for iommu support. The only
>> user, spapr, is also converted, but it still provides a DMAContext
>> interface until the non-PC
Il 10/05/2013 15:07, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> @@ -2234,10 +2239,12 @@ static void pci_device_class_init(ObjectClass
>> *klass, void *data)
>> k->props = pci_props;
>> }
>>
>> -void pci_setup_iommu(PCIBus *bus, PCIDMAContextFunc fn, void *opaque)
>> +void pci_setup_iommu(PCIBus *
On 05/08/2013 12:16 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Avi Kivity
>
> Use the new iommu support in the memory core for iommu support. The only
> user, spapr, is also converted, but it still provides a DMAContext
> interface until the non-PCI bits switch to AddressSpace.
>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin
On 7 May 2013 15:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Avi Kivity
>
> Use the new iommu support in the memory core for iommu support. The only
> user, spapr, is also converted, but it still provides a DMAContext
> interface until the non-PCI bits switch to AddressSpace.
>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin
>
From: Avi Kivity
Use the new iommu support in the memory core for iommu support. The only
user, spapr, is also converted, but it still provides a DMAContext
interface until the non-PCI bits switch to AddressSpace.
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
