08.06.2019 1:08, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/19 2:17 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 07.06.2019 21:10, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/7/19 10:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
> Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this
On 6/7/19 2:17 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 07.06.2019 21:10, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/7/19 10:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. Thi
07.06.2019 21:10, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/19 10:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>>> Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
>>> bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This makes a more obvious symmetry
>>> with bdrv_remove_persistent_
On 6/7/19 1:10 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/19 10:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>>> Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
>>> bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This makes a more obvious symmetry
>>> with bdrv_remove_persistent
07.06.2019 21:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 07.06.2019 21:10, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/7/19 10:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This ma
On 6/7/19 10:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>> Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
>> bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This makes a more obvious symmetry
>> with bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap. Most importantly, we are free
06.06.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
> Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
> bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This makes a more obvious symmetry
> with bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap. Most importantly, we are free
> to modify the driver state because we know we ARE adding a bit
On 6/6/19 1:41 PM, John Snow wrote:
> Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
> bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This makes a more obvious symmetry
> with bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap. Most importantly, we are free
> to modify the driver state because we know we ARE adding a bi
Instead of bdrv_can_store_new_bitmap, rework this as
bdrv_add_persistent_dirty_bitmap. This makes a more obvious symmetry
with bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap. Most importantly, we are free
to modify the driver state because we know we ARE adding a bitmap
instead of simply being asked if we CAN
