Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Didier Pallard wrote: > Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may > break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not > really done when returning from guest_notifier_mask call, instead > message is posted in a unix socket, and proce

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

On 02/04/2016 02:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Didier Pallard wrote: Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not really done when returning from guest_notifier_mask call, instead

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Didier Pallard wrote: > Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may > break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not > really done when returning from guest_notifier_mask call, instead > message is posted in a unix socket, and proce

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

On 12/07/2015 02:59 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Didier Pallard wrote: Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not really d

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

Hi On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Didier Pallard > wrote: >> Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may >> break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not >> really done when returning from guest_notifie

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

Hi On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Didier Pallard wrote: > Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may > break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not > really done when returning from guest_notifier_mask call, instead > message is posted in a unix socket, and processed

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-pci: add an option to bypass guest_notifier_mask

Using guest_notifier_mask function in vhost-user case may break interrupt mask paradigm, because mask/unmask is not really done when returning from guest_notifier_mask call, instead message is posted in a unix socket, and processed later. Add an option bit to disable the use of guest_notifier_mask