>
> How much did you test this patch, by the way? I've been running into
> some odd behaviour with sub-page-sized memory regions which I'm
> wondering if you hit here...
An e1000 attached as a pci card works fine. (ping and wget www.google.com)
Expose only one container MemoryRegion to sysbus.
(Peter Maydell's idea)
Signed-off-by: Benoît Canet
---
hw/ppce500_mpc8544ds.c | 14 ++
hw/ppce500_pci.c | 27 ++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppce500_mpc8544ds.
>
> Is this change actually necessary? If we only have one MMIO region
> to map then sysbus_create_varargs() suffices.
>
> Ack,
> How much did you test this patch, by the way? I've been running into
> some odd behaviour with sub-page-sized memory regions which I'm
> wondering if you hit here...
>
On 2 December 2011 14:51, Benoît Canet wrote:
> @@ -320,10 +321,15 @@ static void mpc8544ds_init(ram_addr_t ram_size,
> sysbus_create_simple("mpc8544-guts", MPC8544_UTIL_BASE, NULL);
>
> /* PCI */
> - dev = sysbus_create_varargs("e500-pcihost", MPC8544_PCI_REGS_BASE,
> -
