On 12/7/18 11:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/6/18 1:25 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> Especially outside of transactions, it is helpful to provide
>> all-or-nothing semantics for bitmap merges. This facilitates
>> the coalescing of multiple bitmaps into a single target for
>> the "checkpoint" interpr
On 12/6/18 1:25 PM, John Snow wrote:
Especially outside of transactions, it is helpful to provide
all-or-nothing semantics for bitmap merges. This facilitates
the coalescing of multiple bitmaps into a single target for
the "checkpoint" interpretation when assembling bitmaps that
represent arbitra
Especially outside of transactions, it is helpful to provide
all-or-nothing semantics for bitmap merges. This facilitates
the coalescing of multiple bitmaps into a single target for
the "checkpoint" interpretation when assembling bitmaps that
represent arbitrary points in time from component bitmap
