On 04/04/12 02:15, David Gibson wrote:
> Shortly before 1.0, we added helper functions / wrappers for doing PCI DMA
> from individual devices. This makes what's going on clearer and means that
> when we add IOMMU support somewhere in the future, only the general PCI
> code will have to change, not
Shortly before 1.0, we added helper functions / wrappers for doing PCI DMA
from individual devices. This makes what's going on clearer and means that
when we add IOMMU support somewhere in the future, only the general PCI
code will have to change, not every device that uses PCI DMA.
However, usb-
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:03:33AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 02.04.2012 06:10, schrieb David Gibson:
> > Shortly before 1.0, we added helper functions / wrappers for doing PCI DMA
> > from individual devices. This makes what's going on clearer and means that
> > when we add IOMMU support s
Am 02.04.2012 06:10, schrieb David Gibson:
> Shortly before 1.0, we added helper functions / wrappers for doing PCI DMA
> from individual devices. This makes what's going on clearer and means that
> when we add IOMMU support somewhere in the future, only the general PCI
> code will have to change,
Shortly before 1.0, we added helper functions / wrappers for doing PCI DMA
from individual devices. This makes what's going on clearer and means that
when we add IOMMU support somewhere in the future, only the general PCI
code will have to change, not every device that uses PCI DMA.
However, usb-
