Dear Max,
Max Reitz writes:
> On 03.08.2016 17:22, Sascha Silbe wrote:
[...]
>> What are the exact semantics of the "offset" field for
>> BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED?
>>
>> docs/qmp-events.txt is rather vague. As an API consumer I'd have assumed
>> that everything up to offset has been completed succes
On 03.08.2016 17:22, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Dear Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> 109 iotest is broken for raw after 0965a41e998ab820b5
>> [mirror: double performance of the bulk stage if the disc is full]
>>
>> The problem is with finishing block-job with error: before spe
Dear Vladimir,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 109 iotest is broken for raw after 0965a41e998ab820b5
> [mirror: double performance of the bulk stage if the disc is full]
>
> The problem is with finishing block-job with error: before specified
> patch mirror was not very async and it creat
109 iotest is broken for raw after 0965a41e998ab820b5
[mirror: double performance of the bulk stage if the disc is full]
The problem is with finishing block-job with error: before specified
patch mirror was not very async and it created one big request at disk
start, this request finished with err
