On Fri, 08/11 14:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 09:54, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 08/10 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> I think the UI (giving no consideration to how we might implement
> >>> this!) would ideally be something like:
> >>> * if anybody mails a patch which touches an "u
On 11/08/2017 09:54, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 08/10 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> I think the UI (giving no consideration to how we might implement
>>> this!) would ideally be something like:
>>> * if anybody mails a patch which touches an "unmaintained" file,
>>>a robot should send a repl
On Thu, 08/10 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > I think the UI (giving no consideration to how we might implement
> > this!) would ideally be something like:
> > * if anybody mails a patch which touches an "unmaintained" file,
> >a robot should send a reply along the lines of "thanks for the
> >
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:22:54 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 August 2017 at 09:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > The root problem is "some files have no maintainers". The reasons range
> > from "forgot to include the file in the pattern" (easily fixed), over
> > "file is updated via a script" (the
On 10/08/2017 11:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> actual default for un-matched: "recent contributors" + qemu-devel@
>>
>> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f disas.c
>> get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found, printing recent contributors.
>> get_maintainer.pl: Do not blindly cc: them on patches! U
On 9 August 2017 at 22:30, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> I wonder if I'm understanding correctly what the MAINTAINERS file is for and
> how to use it.
>
> From an submitter view I feel a bit confused. I thought ./get_maintainer.pl
> would give me the list of person to email the changes I did on
On 10 August 2017 at 09:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> The root problem is "some files have no maintainers". The reasons range
> from "forgot to include the file in the pattern" (easily fixed), over
> "file is updated via a script" (the linux-headers case), to "nobody
> feels up to the task" (which is
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:30:25 -0300
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> [I added mails of other person who reply to this series, this mail is
> not directly addressed to Alex]
Hey, a maintainership discussion! I don't think we had one before 8)
>
> On 08/09/2017 11:38 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > Phi
[I added mails of other person who reply to this series, this mail is
not directly addressed to Alex]
On 08/09/2017 11:38 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
[...]
Do you think there should be another entry in "Block QAPI, monitor,
command line"?
or this file (and related i
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> On 08/08/2017 12:11 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> [...]>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 8cb94af6c5..6b83dac812 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ Common code
>>> M: Richa
On 08/08/2017 12:11 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
[...]>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 8cb94af6c5..6b83dac812 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ Common code
M: Richard Henderson
S: Maintained
F: tcg/
+F: disas.c
Is
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 8cb94af6c5..6b83dac812 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ Common code
> M:
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 8cb94af6c5..6b83dac812 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ Common code
M: Richard Henderson
S: Maintained
F: tcg/
+F: disas.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
