On 13/04/2015 18:00, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 04/13/2015 08:44 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 13/04/2015 03:30, Corey Minyard wrote:
Hmm, I don't see patch 15/15 so I don't know how this is used.
>>> Yeah, I resent and I don't know what's happened. All the others were
>>> sent exactly t
On 04/13/2015 08:44 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2015 03:30, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>> Hmm, I don't see patch 15/15 so I don't know how this is used.
>> Yeah, I resent and I don't know what's happened. All the others were
>> sent exactly the same way. Something doesn't like that patch.
>
On 13/04/2015 13:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So you are suggesting each device add it's own SSDT? I'm not sure how
that helps debugging, it seems simpler to add it to a common one.
>>>
>>> For example, it's easier to write a unit test: encode something specific
>>> in one of the IDs
On 13/04/2015 03:30, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't see patch 15/15 so I don't know how this is used.
>
> Yeah, I resent and I don't know what's happened. All the others were
> sent exactly the same way. Something doesn't like that patch.
Can you send that privately? Or put it somewhe
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 13/04/2015 08:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > So you are suggesting each device add it's own SSDT? I'm not sure how
> >> > that helps debugging, it seems simpler to add it to a common one.
> > For example, it's easier t
On 13/04/2015 08:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > So you are suggesting each device add it's own SSDT? I'm not sure how
>> > that helps debugging, it seems simpler to add it to a common one.
> For example, it's easier to write a unit test: encode something specific
> in one of the IDs, then lo
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 08:30:45PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 04/12/2015 11:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0500, miny...@acm.org wrote:
> >> From: Corey Minyard
> >>
> >> This way devices can tie in when then SSDT is built and can add their
> >> own
On 04/12/2015 11:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0500, miny...@acm.org wrote:
>> From: Corey Minyard
>>
>> This way devices can tie in when then SSDT is built and can add their
>> own entries. This didn't seem to fit anyplace else, primarily because it
>> re
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0500, miny...@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard
>
> This way devices can tie in when then SSDT is built and can add their
> own entries. This didn't seem to fit anyplace else, primarily because it
> required the Aml type, so I added a new file for it.
>
>
From: Corey Minyard
This way devices can tie in when then SSDT is built and can add their
own entries. This didn't seem to fit anyplace else, primarily because it
required the Aml type, so I added a new file for it.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard
---
hw/acpi/Makefile.objs| 1 +
hw/acpi
10 matches
Mail list logo