On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 12:04 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:21:07AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > Instead, pass GETPC() result to the corresponding helpers. This
> > requires a bit of fiddling to get the PC (hopefully) right in
> > the case where we generate a p
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:21:07AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Instead, pass GETPC() result to the corresponding helpers. This
> requires a bit of fiddling to get the PC (hopefully) right in
> the case where we generate a program check, though the hacks there
> are temporary, a subsequen
Instead, pass GETPC() result to the corresponding helpers. This
requires a bit of fiddling to get the PC (hopefully) right in
the case where we generate a program check, though the hacks there
are temporary, a subsequent patch will clean this all up by always
having the nip already set to the right
