On 04/09/2016 04:41 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 8 Apr 2016, at 23:05, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> Since we know that the maximum name we are willing to accept
>> is small enough to stack-allocate, rework the iteration over
>> NBD_OPT_LIST responses to reuse a stack buffer rather than
>> allocating e
On 8 Apr 2016, at 23:05, Eric Blake wrote:
> Since we know that the maximum name we are willing to accept
> is small enough to stack-allocate, rework the iteration over
> NBD_OPT_LIST responses to reuse a stack buffer rather than
> allocating every time. Furthermore, we don't even have to
> all
Since we know that the maximum name we are willing to accept
is small enough to stack-allocate, rework the iteration over
NBD_OPT_LIST responses to reuse a stack buffer rather than
allocating every time. Furthermore, we don't even have to
allocate if we know the server's length doesn't match what
