On 11/14/2010 03:39 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> The code in this patch was introduced for a Solaris port, but
> ln -sf exists in Solaris 2.6 at least.
The problem is not that 'ln -sf' would not exist, but rather that the
force of the '-f' flag is too weak to actually remove anything.
Oh well...
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The code in this patch was introduced for a Solaris port, but
> ln -sf exists in Solaris 2.6 at least.
The problem is not that 'ln -sf' would not exist, but rather that the
force of the '-f' flag is too weak to actually remove anything.
The code in this patch was introduced for a Solaris port, but
ln -sf exists in Solaris 2.6 at least.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
configure | 19 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 2d2d306..5a3b127 100755
--- a/co
