Am 08.06.2012 15:55, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 06/07/2012 08:57 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 04.06.2012 10:52, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>> We will some use this function also for property parsing, so move it
>>> over unmodified and rename it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> These last th
On 06/08/2012 10:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-06-08 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2012-06-08 14:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
Can't understand that you're trying to push your v1 so h
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-08 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 08.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> >> On 2012-06-08 14:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >>> Can't understand that you're trying to push your v1 so hard now when our
> >>> series have been
On 06/07/2012 08:57 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 04.06.2012 10:52, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
We will some use this function also for property parsing, so move it
over unmodified and rename it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
refactoring: qdev p
On 2012-06-08 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2012-06-08 14:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Can't understand that you're trying to push your v1 so hard now when our
>>> series have been on the list for much longer. ;)
>>
>> I explained the reason, and I t
Am 08.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2012-06-08 14:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Can't understand that you're trying to push your v1 so hard now when our
>> series have been on the list for much longer. ;)
>
> I explained the reason, and I think my patches (minus the dropped one)
> are rea
On 2012-06-08 14:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.06.2012 12:57, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2012-06-07 17:56, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 07.06.2012 17:11, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2012-06-07 14:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
> These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
>
Am 08.06.2012 12:57, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2012-06-07 17:56, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 07.06.2012 17:11, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>> On 2012-06-07 14:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
refactoring: qdev properties are being generalized
On 2012-06-07 17:56, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 07.06.2012 17:11, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2012-06-07 14:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
>>> refactoring: qdev properties are being generalized to Object and
>>> on my GitHub "realize" branc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 07.06.2012 17:11, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2012-06-07 14:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
>> refactoring: qdev properties are being generalized to Object and
>> on my GitHub "realize" branch
On 2012-06-07 14:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 04.06.2012 10:52, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> We will some use this function also for property parsing, so move it
>> over unmodified and rename it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>
> These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
> refact
Am 04.06.2012 10:52, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> We will some use this function also for property parsing, so move it
> over unmodified and rename it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
These last three patches collide with Paolo's QOM properties
refactoring: qdev properties are being generalized to Object
We will some use this function also for property parsing, so move it
over unmodified and rename it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
hw/pci-hotplug.c |2 +-
hw/pci.c | 67 +-
hw/pci.h |5 ---
hw/qdev-properties.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
