Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 10/02/2014 14:29, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> Markus Armbruster writes:
>>
>>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>>
Il 06/02/2014 15:30, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
> visitors try to cope w
Il 10/02/2014 14:29, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Markus Armbruster writes:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
Il 06/02/2014 15:30, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
in
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
>> Il 06/02/2014 15:30, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>>> Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
>>> visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
>>> instance like this:
>>>
>>> visit_st
Il 07/02/2014 15:23, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> No objections to patch 1-9.
What does it take make you accept PATCH 10?
The email you just wrote, basically, :) and removing the NULL pointer
checks in the visitor implementations.
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 06/02/2014 15:30, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
>> visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
>> instance like this:
>>
>> visit_start_optional(m, obj ? &(*obj)->has_na
Il 06/02/2014 15:30, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
instance like this:
visit_start_optional(m, obj ? &(*obj)->has_name : NULL, "name", &err);
visit_start
Eric Blake writes:
> On 02/06/2014 07:30 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
>> visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
>> instance like this:
>>
>> visit_start_optional(m, obj ? &(*obj)->has_name :
On 02/06/2014 07:30 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
> visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
> instance like this:
>
> visit_start_optional(m, obj ? &(*obj)->has_name : NULL, "name", &err);
>
> v
Visitors get passed a pointer to the visited object. The generated
visitors try to cope with this pointer being null in some places, for
instance like this:
visit_start_optional(m, obj ? &(*obj)->has_name : NULL, "name", &err);
visit_start_optional() passes its second argument to Visitor met
