On Tue, 07/02 12:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/07/2013 07:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> > Use numeric value to replace in_use flag in BDS, this will make
> > lifecycle management with ref count possible. This patch only replaces
> > existing uses of bdrv_set_in_use, so no logic change here.
>
> T
On Tue, 07/02 13:41, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 11:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Use numeric value to replace in_use flag in BDS, this will make
> > lifecycle management with ref count possible. This patch only replaces
> > existing uses of bdrv_set_in_use, so no logic change here.
> >
> > Si
On 07/01/2013 11:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Use numeric value to replace in_use flag in BDS, this will make
> lifecycle management with ref count possible. This patch only replaces
> existing uses of bdrv_set_in_use, so no logic change here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> block-migration.c
Il 02/07/2013 07:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> Use numeric value to replace in_use flag in BDS, this will make
> lifecycle management with ref count possible. This patch only replaces
> existing uses of bdrv_set_in_use, so no logic change here.
This still does not entirely explain the rules for who
Use numeric value to replace in_use flag in BDS, this will make
lifecycle management with ref count possible. This patch only replaces
existing uses of bdrv_set_in_use, so no logic change here.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block-migration.c | 4 ++--
block.c
