Am 14.10.2015 um 20:21 schrieb John Snow:
>
> On 10/14/2015 02:19 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Am 08.10.2015 um 18:44 schrieb John Snow:
>>> On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi all,
short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
let me explain why
Am 08.10.2015 um 18:44 schrieb John Snow:
>
> On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
>> let me explain why:
>>
>> 1) During review I found that the code in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end can't
>> work correctly if
On 10/14/2015 02:19 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 18:44 schrieb John Snow:
>>
>> On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
>>> let me explain why:
>>>
>>> 1) During review I found that the cod
Am 08.10.2015 um 18:44 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
> > let me explain why:
> >
> > 1) During review I found that the code in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end can't
> > wor
Am 09.10.2015 um 10:21 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 18:44 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>> On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
>>> let me explain why:
>>>
>>> 1) During review I found that the c
On 10/09/2015 04:21 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 18:44 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>> On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
>>> let me explain why:
>>>
>>> 1) During review I found that the
On 10/08/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated,
> let me explain why:
>
> 1) During review I found that the code in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end can't
> work correctly if the
> byte_count_limit is not a divider or a mult
Hi all,
short summary from my side. The whole thing seems to get complicated, let me
explain why:
1) During review I found that the code in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end can't work
correctly if the
byte_count_limit is not a divider or a multiple of cd_sector_size. The reason
is that as soon
as we l
Am 07.10.2015 um 18:42 schrieb John Snow:
>
> On 10/06/2015 04:46 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 schrieb John Snow:
>>> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has to siginificant drawbacks.
On 10/06/2015 04:46 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 schrieb John Snow:
>>
>> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
>>> This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
>>> I/O re
Am 06.10.2015 um 17:54 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>
>
> On 10/06/2015 04:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
> >>> Thi
Am 06.10.2015 um 19:56 schrieb John Snow:
>
> On 10/06/2015 01:12 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Am 06.10.2015 um 19:07 schrieb John Snow :
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 10/06/2015 05:20 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 06.10.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieb
> Am 06.10.2015 um 19:07 schrieb John Snow :
>
>
>
>> On 10/06/2015 05:20 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Am 06.10.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
>>> Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> PIO read requests on the ATAPI inte
On 10/06/2015 02:31 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 06.10.2015 um 19:56 schrieb John Snow:
>>
>> On 10/06/2015 01:12 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 06.10.2015 um 19:07 schrieb John Snow :
> On 10/06/2015 05:20 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Am 06.10.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Kevin Wo
On 10/06/2015 01:12 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
>> Am 06.10.2015 um 19:07 schrieb John Snow :
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/06/2015 05:20 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 06.10.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>
> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Li
On 10/06/2015 05:20 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 06.10.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
>> Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>>>
>>> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has to siginifica
On 10/06/2015 04:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
>>> This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
>
On 09/21/15 14:25, Peter Lieven wrote:
> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
> This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
Trivial comments:
- s/to/two/
- s/siginificant/significant/
Thanks
Laszlo
> I/O request is completed and secondl
Am 06.10.2015 um 10:46 schrieb Peter Lieven:
Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 schrieb John Snow:
On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
I/O request is complet
Am 06.10.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
I/O request is c
Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>
>
> On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
> > This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
> > I/O request is completed and secondly if the
Am 05.10.2015 um 23:15 schrieb John Snow:
On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
co
On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
> This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
> I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
> complete (e.g. due to an unresponsive
On 09/21/2015 08:25 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
> This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
> I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
> complete (e.g. due to an unresponsive
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has to siginificant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
complete (e.g. due to an unresponsive storage) Qemu hangs completely.
Signed-off-by: Peter
25 matches
Mail list logo
