Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2014-09-12 11:29:46)
> Il 12/09/2014 18:17, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> > Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2014-09-12 10:39:49)
> >> Il 12/09/2014 17:34, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>> { 'union': 'UserDefUnion',
> >>> 'base': 'UserDefZero',
> >>> 'data': { 'a' : 'int', 'b' : '
Il 12/09/2014 18:17, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2014-09-12 10:39:49)
>> Il 12/09/2014 17:34, Michael Roth ha scritto:
>>>
>>> { 'union': 'UserDefUnion',
>>> 'base': 'UserDefZero',
>>> 'data': { 'a' : 'int', 'b' : 'UserDefB' } }
>>>
>>> If UserDefUnion.a is 0, UserDefUnion
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2014-09-12 10:39:49)
> Il 12/09/2014 17:34, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> >
> > { 'union': 'UserDefUnion',
> > 'base': 'UserDefZero',
> > 'data': { 'a' : 'int', 'b' : 'UserDefB' } }
> >
> > If UserDefUnion.a is 0, UserDefUnion.data will cast it to a NULL value and
> > caus
Il 12/09/2014 17:34, Michael Roth ha scritto:
>
> { 'union': 'UserDefUnion',
> 'base': 'UserDefZero',
> 'data': { 'a' : 'int', 'b' : 'UserDefB' } }
>
> If UserDefUnion.a is 0, UserDefUnion.data will cast it to a NULL value and
> cause the output visitor to bail, when really it should just be
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2014-09-12 05:17:12)
> Il 12/09/2014 01:20, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> > In some cases an input visitor might bail out on filling out a
> > struct for various reasons, such as missing fields when running
> > in strict mode. In the case of a QAPI Union type, this may lead
> >
Quoting Eric Blake (2014-09-11 21:29:24)
> On 09/11/2014 05:20 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> > In some cases an input visitor might bail out on filling out a
> > struct for various reasons, such as missing fields when running
> > in strict mode. In the case of a QAPI Union type, this may lead
> > to ca
Il 12/09/2014 01:20, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> In some cases an input visitor might bail out on filling out a
> struct for various reasons, such as missing fields when running
> in strict mode. In the case of a QAPI Union type, this may lead
> to cases where the .kind field which encodes the union
On 09/11/2014 05:20 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> In some cases an input visitor might bail out on filling out a
> struct for various reasons, such as missing fields when running
> in strict mode. In the case of a QAPI Union type, this may lead
> to cases where the .kind field which encodes the union t
In some cases an input visitor might bail out on filling out a
struct for various reasons, such as missing fields when running
in strict mode. In the case of a QAPI Union type, this may lead
to cases where the .kind field which encodes the union type
is uninitialized. Subsequently, other visitors,
