On 6/21/19 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> If we are trying to set multiple bits at once, testing that just one of
> them is already set gives a false positive. As a result we won't
> interrupt guest if e.g. presence detection change and attention button
> press are both set. This happens with
On 6/21/19 9:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
If we are trying to set multiple bits at once, testing that just one of
them is already set gives a false positive. As a result we won't
interrupt guest if e.g. presence detection change and attention button
press are both set. This happens with mu
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:46:46 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> If we are trying to set multiple bits at once, testing that just one of
> them is already set gives a false positive. As a result we won't
> interrupt guest if e.g. presence detection change and attention button
> press are both set
If we are trying to set multiple bits at once, testing that just one of
them is already set gives a false positive. As a result we won't
interrupt guest if e.g. presence detection change and attention button
press are both set. This happens with multi-function device removal.
Signed-off-by: Michae