On 30.11.2017 14:41, Eric Blake wrote:
> For a couple of macros in pcnet.c, we have to provide a new scope
> to avoid compiler warnings about declarations in the middle of a
> switch statement that aren't in a sub-scope. But use of
> 'do { ... } while (0);' merely to provide that new scope is arca
For a couple of macros in pcnet.c, we have to provide a new scope
to avoid compiler warnings about declarations in the middle of a
switch statement that aren't in a sub-scope. But use of
'do { ... } while (0);' merely to provide that new scope is arcane
overkill, compared to just using '{ ... }'.
