On 01.07.2011, at 10:07, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 10:02 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 01.07.2011, at 09:42, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
>>> Occasionally, the buffer needs to be placed at a offset within
>>> the iovec when copying the buffer to the iovec.
>>
>> So this is a buf
On 07/01/2011 10:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/01/2011 09:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
size_t iov_from_buf(struct iovec *iov, unsigned int iovcnt,
- const void *buf, size_t size)
+ const void *buf, size_t offset, size_t size)
Wrong commit subject, it seems. :)
Bummer.
Cheers,
Hannes
-
On 01.07.2011, at 09:42, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Occasionally, the buffer needs to be placed at a offset within
> the iovec when copying the buffer to the iovec.
So this is a buffer into the iovec, right? Wouldn't it make sense to also
modify iov_to_buf respectively then, so the API stays simi
On 07/01/2011 10:02 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01.07.2011, at 09:42, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Occasionally, the buffer needs to be placed at a offset within
the iovec when copying the buffer to the iovec.
So this is a buffer into the iovec, right? Wouldn't it make sense
> to also modify iov_
On 07/01/2011 09:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
size_t iov_from_buf(struct iovec *iov, unsigned int iovcnt,
-const void *buf, size_t size)
+const void *buf, size_t offset, size_t size)
Wrong commit subject, it seems. :)
Paolo
Occasionally, the buffer needs to be placed at a offset within
the iovec when copying the buffer to the iovec.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
hw/virtio-net.c|2 +-
hw/virtio-serial-bus.c |2 +-
iov.c | 23 ++-
iov.h |
