On 7 December 2015 at 10:31, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
>> On 07/12/2015 09:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> The device is obviously useful. However, there is dissent on how it
>>> ought to be modelled. The modelling is visible at the -device user
>>> interface. By maki
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 07/12/2015 09:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> The device is obviously useful. However, there is dissent on how it
>> ought to be modelled. The modelling is visible at the -device user
>> interface. By making the device available there in 2.5, we commit to
>> the curr
On 07/12/2015 09:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The device is obviously useful. However, there is dissent on how it
> ought to be modelled. The modelling is visible at the -device user
> interface. By making the device available there in 2.5, we commit to
> the current modelling's user interfa
"Kevin O'Connor" writes:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 04:02:14PM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:21AM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> >> > FWIW, I don't think the SD card will be qdevified because it doe
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 04:02:14PM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:21AM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> >> > FWIW, I don't think the SD card will be qdevified because it doesn't
> >> > need a bus. It's si
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:21AM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> > FWIW, I don't think the SD card will be qdevified because it doesn't
>> > need a bus. It's similar indeed to SerialState, which was supposed to
>> > be the poster child
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:21AM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> > FWIW, I don't think the SD card will be qdevified because it doesn't
> > need a bus. It's similar indeed to SerialState, which was supposed to
> > be the poster child of QOM embedding and never got QOMified.
>
> SD is a bus in
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2015 12:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 December 2015 at 07:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
On 7 September 2015 at 17:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 7
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:55:07PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 December 2015 at 12:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > To finally answer your question: the proper owner of the property
> > connecting the backend is the frontend half of the split device. So, if
> > we have separate device mode
On 04/12/2015 12:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 December 2015 at 07:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> On 7 September 2015 at 17:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter M
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 4 December 2015 at 12:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> To finally answer your question: the proper owner of the property
>> connecting the backend is the frontend half of the split device. So, if
>> we have separate device models for controller and the block devices
>>
On 4 December 2015 at 12:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> To finally answer your question: the proper owner of the property
> connecting the backend is the frontend half of the split device. So, if
> we have separate device models for controller and the block devices
> connected to it, the block ba
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 4 December 2015 at 07:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> On 7 September 2015 at 17:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
On 4 December 2015 at 07:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 7 September 2015 at 17:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 7 September 2015 at 17:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>>>
> +static Property pxa2xx_m
On 7 September 2015 at 17:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>>
+static Property pxa2xx_mmci_properties[] = {
+/*
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>
>>> +static Property pxa2xx_mmci_properties[] = {
>>> +/* Note: pointer property 'drive' may r
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>
>>> +static Property pxa2xx_mmci_properties[] = {
>>> +/* Note: pointer property 'drive' may remain NULL, thus no need
>>> +
On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>> +static Property pxa2xx_mmci_properties[] = {
>> +/* Note: pointer property 'drive' may remain NULL, thus no need
>> + * for dc->cannot_instantiate
Peter Maydell writes:
> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> ---
> hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c | 96
> +++--
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c b/hw
Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c | 96 +++--
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c b/hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c
index d1fe6d5..5b676c7
21 matches
Mail list logo
