On Di, 2013-11-05 at 18:48 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Unlike the existing FW_CFG_E820_TABLE entry which carries reservations
> > only the new etc/e820 file also has entries for RAM.
>
> Acked, it looks the best the w
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Unlike the existing FW_CFG_E820_TABLE entry which carries reservations
> only the new etc/e820 file also has entries for RAM.
Acked, it looks the best the way to go if the objective is to keep
backwards compatibility with older
Unlike the existing FW_CFG_E820_TABLE entry which carries reservations
only the new etc/e820 file also has entries for RAM.
Format is simliar to the FW_CFG_E820_TABLE, it is a simple list of
e820_entry structs. Unlike FW_CFG_E820_TABLE it has no count though
as the number of entries can be figure
Unlike the existing FW_CFG_E820_TABLE entry which carries reservations
only the new etc/e820 file also has entries for RAM.
Format is simliar to the FW_CFG_E820_TABLE, it is a simple list of
e820_entry structs. Unlike FW_CFG_E820_TABLE it has no count though
as the number of entries can be figure
