On 13 December 2012 17:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 13.12.2012 15:45, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 12 December 2012 06:29, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> After reading a single-byte I2C response such as the tmp105's response
>>> to 0x01 0x00, the SBD status bit would not get reset on next read, stil
Am 13.12.2012 15:45, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 12 December 2012 06:29, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> After reading a single-byte I2C response such as the tmp105's response
>> to 0x01 0x00, the SBD status bit would not get reset on next read, still
>> indicating validity of only a single byte. Clear i
On 12 December 2012 06:29, Andreas Färber wrote:
> After reading a single-byte I2C response such as the tmp105's response
> to 0x01 0x00, the SBD status bit would not get reset on next read, still
> indicating validity of only a single byte. Clear it on next word read.
This doesn't seem to corres
After reading a single-byte I2C response such as the tmp105's response
to 0x01 0x00, the SBD status bit would not get reset on next read, still
indicating validity of only a single byte. Clear it on next word read.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
hw/omap_i2c.c |1 +
1 Datei geändert, 1 Zei