On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:06:13 +0200
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:01:45PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:28:34 +0200
> > Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > > On sparc targets, info cpus returns this kind of output:
> > >
> > > | info cpus
> > > | * CPU
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:01:45PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:28:34 +0200
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > On sparc targets, info cpus returns this kind of output:
> >
> > | info cpus
> > | * CPU #0:
> > pc=0x00424d18pc=0x00424d18npc=0x00424d1c
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:28:34 +0200
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On sparc targets, info cpus returns this kind of output:
>
> | info cpus
> | * CPU #0: pc=0x00424d18pc=0x00424d18npc=0x00424d1c
> thread_id=19460
>
> pc is printed twice, there is no space between pc, pc and npc
On sparc targets, info cpus returns this kind of output:
| info cpus
| * CPU #0: pc=0x00424d18pc=0x00424d18npc=0x00424d1c
thread_id=19460
pc is printed twice, there is no space between pc, pc and npc. As npc
implies pc, don't set has_pc on sparc, and add a space between p