On 24 April 2013 08:25, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-04-24三的 09:11 +0200，Aurelien Jarno写道：
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:36:54AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Il 24/04/2013 03:48, liguang ha scritto:
>> > > cs_base is only meaningful for target-i386/sparc,
>> > > so, get rid of cs_base for other ta
在 2013-04-24三的 09:11 +0200，Aurelien Jarno写道：
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:36:54AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 24/04/2013 03:48, liguang ha scritto:
> > > cs_base is only meaningful for target-i386/sparc,
> > > so, get rid of cs_base for other target
> >
> > This is really ugly, we're trying
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:36:54AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/04/2013 03:48, liguang ha scritto:
> > cs_base is only meaningful for target-i386/sparc,
> > so, get rid of cs_base for other target
>
> This is really ugly, we're trying to get less target-dependent code
> outside target-*, no
Il 24/04/2013 03:48, liguang ha scritto:
> cs_base is only meaningful for target-i386/sparc,
> so, get rid of cs_base for other target
This is really ugly, we're trying to get less target-dependent code
outside target-*, not more.
Also, please limit the number of people that you CC.
Paolo
> Sig
cs_base is only meaningful for target-i386/sparc,
so, get rid of cs_base for other target
Signed-off-by: liguang
---
cpu-exec.c | 26 ++
exec.c |6 +++---
hw/i386/kvmvapic.c |6 ++
include/exec/exec-all.h |5 +++--
targ
