On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > I've also just skimmed parts of the 8254 section of "The Indispensable PC
> > Hardware Book", by Hans-Peter Messmer, Copyright 1994 Addison-Wesley,
> > although I probably ought to read it more carefully.
>
> http://download.intel.com/design/archives/per
On 2012-09-13 07:49, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-09-12 10:51, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2012 11:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-09-12 10:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>> I
On 2012-09-13 15:41, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>
>> Also, how big of a concern is a very rare gained or lost IRQ0
>> actually? Under normal conditions, I would expect this to at most
>> cause a one time clock drift in the guest OS of a fraction of
>> a
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> Also, how big of a concern is a very rare gained or lost IRQ0
> actually? Under normal conditions, I would expect this to at most
> cause a one time clock drift in the guest OS of a fraction of
> a second. If that only happens when rebooting or migra
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-09-12 10:51, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 09/12/2012 11:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-09-12 10:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "a
On 09/12/2012 11:57 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-09-12 10:51, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/12/2012 11:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-09-12 10:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "asserted with a
> l
On 2012-09-12 10:51, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 11:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-09-12 10:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "asserted with a
low-to-high transition at the time an interrupt is
On 09/12/2012 11:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-09-12 10:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>>> Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "asserted with a
>>> low-to-high transition at the time an interrupt is registered
>>> and then kept high until the
On 2012-09-12 10:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>> Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "asserted with a
>> low-to-high transition at the time an interrupt is registered
>> and then kept high until the interrupt is served via one of the
>> EOI mechan
On 09/10/2012 04:29 AM, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "asserted with a
> low-to-high transition at the time an interrupt is registered
> and then kept high until the interrupt is served via one of the
> EOI mechanisms or goes away unhandled."
>
> So the onl
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> > > This bug manifested itself when the guest was Microport UNIX
> > > System V/386 v2.1 (ca. 1987), because it would sometimes mask
> > > off IRQ14 in the slave IMR after it had already been asserted.
> > > The master would still try to deliver an int
On 2012-09-11 02:49, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>
>> This bug manifested itself when the guest was Microport UNIX
>> System V/386 v2.1 (ca. 1987), because it would sometimes mask
>> off IRQ14 in the slave IMR after it had already been asserted.
>> The mas
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:49:51AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>
> > This bug manifested itself when the guest was Microport UNIX
> > System V/386 v2.1 (ca. 1987), because it would sometimes mask
> > off IRQ14 in the slave IMR after it had already b
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> This bug manifested itself when the guest was Microport UNIX
> System V/386 v2.1 (ca. 1987), because it would sometimes mask
> off IRQ14 in the slave IMR after it had already been asserted.
> The master would still try to deliver an interrupt even thoug
Intel's definition of "edge triggered" means: "asserted with a
low-to-high transition at the time an interrupt is registered
and then kept high until the interrupt is served via one of the
EOI mechanisms or goes away unhandled."
So the only difference between edge triggered and level triggered
is
15 matches
Mail list logo