On 06/30/2019 02:51 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 05:43:09PM -0300, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
On 06/21/2019 11:38 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 6/21/19 8:09 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
It's a fact that
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 05:43:09PM -0300, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
>
> On 06/21/2019 11:38 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > On 6/21/19 8:09 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > > > It's a fact that some tests may not be 100% r
On 06/21/2019 11:38 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 6/21/19 8:09 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
It's a fact that some tests may not be 100% reliable in all
environments. While it's a tough call to remove a useful test that
from the tr
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/21/19 8:09 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > It's a fact that some tests may not be 100% reliable in all
> > environments. While it's a tough call to remove a useful test that
> > from the tree because it may fail every 1/100t
On 6/21/19 8:09 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> It's a fact that some tests may not be 100% reliable in all
> environments. While it's a tough call to remove a useful test that
> from the tree because it may fail every 1/100th time (or so), having
> human attention drawn to known issues is very bad for h
It's a fact that some tests may not be 100% reliable in all
environments. While it's a tough call to remove a useful test that
from the tree because it may fail every 1/100th time (or so), having
human attention drawn to known issues is very bad for humans and for
the projects they manage.
As a c
