On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 04:45 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:49:05PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> >> we should call trace_init_backends() before trace_init_file() for
> >> CONFIG_TRACE_SIMPLE There is no dif
On 02/11/2016 04:45 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:49:05PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> we should call trace_init_backends() before trace_init_file() for
>> CONFIG_TRACE_SIMPLE There is no difference for other cases.
>>
>> This problem was introduced by the commit
>>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:49:05PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> we should call trace_init_backends() before trace_init_file() for
> CONFIG_TRACE_SIMPLE There is no difference for other cases.
>
> This problem was introduced by the commit
> commit 41fc57e44ed64cd4ab5393d83624afd897dabd4f
>
On 02/09/2016 05:49 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> we should call trace_init_backends() before trace_init_file() for
> CONFIG_TRACE_SIMPLE There is no difference for other cases.
>
> This problem was introduced by the commit
> commit 41fc57e44ed64cd4ab5393d83624afd897dabd4f
> Author: Paolo Bo
Denis V. Lunev writes:
> we should call trace_init_backends() before trace_init_file() for
> CONFIG_TRACE_SIMPLE There is no difference for other cases.
>
> This problem was introduced by the commit
> commit 41fc57e44ed64cd4ab5393d83624afd897dabd4f
> Author: Paolo Bonzini
> Date:
we should call trace_init_backends() before trace_init_file() for
CONFIG_TRACE_SIMPLE There is no difference for other cases.
This problem was introduced by the commit
commit 41fc57e44ed64cd4ab5393d83624afd897dabd4f
Author: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Thu Jan 7 16:55:24 2016 +0300
trac