On 05/09/2018 12:26 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> This is the first step towards creating an infrastructure for generic
> background jobs that aren't tied to a block device. For now, Job only
> stores its ID and JobDriver, the rest stays in BlockJob.
>
> The following patches will move over more parts
Am 12.05.2018 um 00:46 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 2018-05-09 18:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > This is the first step towards creating an infrastructure for generic
> > background jobs that aren't tied to a block device. For now, Job only
> > stores its ID and JobDriver, the rest stays in BlockJob.
On 2018-05-09 18:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> This is the first step towards creating an infrastructure for generic
> background jobs that aren't tied to a block device. For now, Job only
> stores its ID and JobDriver, the rest stays in BlockJob.
>
> The following patches will move over more parts of B
This is the first step towards creating an infrastructure for generic
background jobs that aren't tied to a block device. For now, Job only
stores its ID and JobDriver, the rest stays in BlockJob.
The following patches will move over more parts of BlockJob to Job if
they are meaningful outside the
