Il 26/11/2013 15:00, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>>
>> I think adding a byte in the middle of the stream is not reliable.
>>
>> Rather, you should transmit the socket always at the same place, for
>> example in the first call of qemu_local_save_ram, after it has written
>> the 64-bit field.
>
> I guess 't
On 11/26/2013 07:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/11/2013 10:11, Lei Li ha scritto:
+/*
+ * recvmsg is called here to catch the control message for
+ * the exchange of PIPE file descriptor until it is received.
+ */
+len = recvmsg(s->s
Il 21/11/2013 10:11, Lei Li ha scritto:
> +/*
> + * recvmsg is called here to catch the control message for
> + * the exchange of PIPE file descriptor until it is received.
> + */
> +len = recvmsg(s->sockfd, &msg, 0);
> +if (le
On 11/21/2013 05:11 PM, Lei Li wrote:
The control message for exchange of pipe file descriptor should
be received by recvmsg, and it might be eaten to stream file by
qemu_recv() when receiving by two callbacks. So this patch adds
unix_msgfd_lookup() to callback get_buffer as the only one receiver
The control message for exchange of pipe file descriptor should
be received by recvmsg, and it might be eaten to stream file by
qemu_recv() when receiving by two callbacks. So this patch adds
unix_msgfd_lookup() to callback get_buffer as the only one receiver,
where the pipe file descriptor would b
