> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Il 09/09/2014 15:59, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> > But poll_msl is "more" interesting, because we are not "reseting it".
> >
> > So, we have that if we are migrating from an old version, we would have
> > poll_msl == -1, and we used to have it to
Il 09/09/2014 14:30, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> From: Pavel Dovgalyuk
>
> Some fields were added to VMState by this patch to preserve correct
> loading of the serial port controller state.
> Updating FCR value while loading was also modified to disable generating
> an interrupt by loadvm.
This
Il 09/09/2014 15:59, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> If it is still -1 at this point, we "calculate" a value for it.
> (I assume it is right, no knowledge of serial port)
Not necessarily right, or we wouldn't need the subsection, but at least
a decent approximation.
> But poll_msl is "more" interesti
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Pavel Dovgalyuk
>
> Some fields were added to VMState by this patch to preserve correct
> loading of the serial port controller state.
> Updating FCR value while loading was also modified to disable generating
> an interrupt by loadvm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgaly
From: Pavel Dovgalyuk
Some fields were added to VMState by this patch to preserve correct
loading of the serial port controller state.
Updating FCR value while loading was also modified to disable generating
an interrupt by loadvm.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
--
