Am 26.01.2014 um 20:02 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> The fail paths of bdrv_file_open() and bdrv_open() naturally exhibit
> similarities, thus it is possible to reuse the one from bdrv_open() and
> shorten the one in bdrv_file_open() accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
I find this change co
On 27.01.2014 04:10, Benoît Canet wrote:
Le Sunday 26 Jan 2014 à 20:02:40 (+0100), Max Reitz a écrit :
The fail paths of bdrv_file_open() and bdrv_open() naturally exhibit
similarities, thus it is possible to reuse the one from bdrv_open() and
shorten the one in bdrv_file_open() accordingly.
Si
Le Sunday 26 Jan 2014 à 20:02:40 (+0100), Max Reitz a écrit :
> The fail paths of bdrv_file_open() and bdrv_open() naturally exhibit
> similarities, thus it is possible to reuse the one from bdrv_open() and
> shorten the one in bdrv_file_open() accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
> ---
> b
The fail paths of bdrv_file_open() and bdrv_open() naturally exhibit
similarities, thus it is possible to reuse the one from bdrv_open() and
shorten the one in bdrv_file_open() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block.c | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions
