On 28/08/2015 16:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > More #ifdefs are not nice, but this clarifies why its usage is not
>> > protected by tb_lock.
> Does it? I thought the idea of this series was to add locking
> which we needed for adding multi-threading to softmmu, in
> which case presumably we need
On 12 August 2015 at 17:40, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> More #ifdefs are not nice, but this clarifies why its usage is not
> protected by tb_lock.
Does it? I thought the idea of this series was to add locking
which we needed for adding multi-threading to softmmu, in
which case presumably we need to pr
More #ifdefs are not nice, but this clarifies why its usage is not
protected by tb_lock.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
translate-all.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/translate-all.c b/translate-all.c
index a6bff72..7aa5664 100644
--- a/translate
