On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:20:22PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 07:43 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> > This breaks the build:
> >
> > make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> >CCppc64-softmmu/spapr_vscsi.o
> > /home/anthony/git/qemu/hw/spapr_vscsi.c: I
Am 19.07.2011 15:26, schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
> On 07/19/2011 03:06 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 19.07.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> On 07/19/2011 05:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
From: Hannes Reinecke
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 07:43 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> This breaks the build:
>
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>CCppc64-softmmu/spapr_vscsi.o
> /home/anthony/git/qemu/hw/spapr_vscsi.c: In function
> ‘vscsi_command_complete’:
> /home/anthony/git/qemu/hw/spapr_vscsi.c:535:
On 07/19/2011 03:06 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 19.07.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/19/2011 05:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
From: Hannes Reinecke
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 15:06 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 19.07.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > On 07/19/2011 05:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> From: Hannes Reinecke
> >>
> >> 'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
> >> from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
> >>
Am 19.07.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 07/19/2011 05:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> From: Hannes Reinecke
>>
>> 'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
>> from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
>> replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
>> Thi
On 07/19/2011 05:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
From: Hannes Reinecke
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
This saves the lookup for driver handling several commands
in para
From: Hannes Reinecke
'tag' is just an abstraction to identify the command
from the driver. So we should make that explicit by
replacing 'tag' with a driver-defined pointer 'hba_private'.
This saves the lookup for driver handling several commands
in parallel.
'tag' is still being kept for tracing
