On 16.04.2012, at 18:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 April 2012 17:27, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 31.03.2012, at 18:26, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>>> Add an explicit CPUPPCState parameter instead of relying on AREG0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
>>> ---
>>> Makefile.target |
On 16 April 2012 17:27, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 31.03.2012, at 18:26, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> Add an explicit CPUPPCState parameter instead of relying on AREG0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
>> ---
>> Makefile.target | 3 -
>> target-ppc/fpu_helper.c | 350
>> +++
Am 16.04.2012 18:27, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
> On 31.03.2012, at 18:26, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> Add an explicit CPUPPCState parameter instead of relying on AREG0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
>> ---
>> Makefile.target |3 -
>> target-ppc/fpu_helper.c | 350
>> +++
On 31.03.2012, at 18:26, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Add an explicit CPUPPCState parameter instead of relying on AREG0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
> ---
> Makefile.target |3 -
> target-ppc/fpu_helper.c | 350 ---
> target-ppc/helper.h | 20