On 20.05.2011, at 05:34, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:25:04AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> QEMU HEAD still uses a 32-bit binary for both 32-bit and
>> 64-bit. That one uses mtsrin so will need the compatibility, it
>> seemed affected, too.
>>
>> OpenBIOS SVN HEAD (blob) us
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:25:04AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> QEMU HEAD still uses a 32-bit binary for both 32-bit and
> 64-bit. That one uses mtsrin so will need the compatibility, it
> seemed affected, too.
>
> OpenBIOS SVN HEAD (blob) uses slb* as linked to. We're in the
> preparation of 1.
QEMU HEAD still uses a 32-bit binary for both 32-bit and 64-bit. That one uses
mtsrin so will need the compatibility, it seemed affected, too.
OpenBIOS SVN HEAD (blob) uses slb* as linked to. We're in the preparation of
1.1 and I need to test it before we can update the QEMU binary. ;)
Sorry fo
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:00:53AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 19.05.2011 um 07:39 schrieb David Gibson:
>
> >On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:35:30AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >>Am 25.03.2011 um 04:21 schrieb David Gibson:
> >>
> >>>Currently the SLB information when emulating a PowerPC 970
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:35:30AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 25.03.2011 um 04:21 schrieb David Gibson:
>
> >Currently the SLB information when emulating a PowerPC 970 is
> >storeed in a structure with the unhelpfully named fields 'tmp'
> >and 'tmp64'. While the layout in these fields does
Am 25.03.2011 um 04:21 schrieb David Gibson:
Currently the SLB information when emulating a PowerPC 970 is
storeed in a structure with the unhelpfully named fields 'tmp'
and 'tmp64'. While the layout in these fields does match the
description of the SLB in the architecture document, it is not
c
Currently the SLB information when emulating a PowerPC 970 is
storeed in a structure with the unhelpfully named fields 'tmp'
and 'tmp64'. While the layout in these fields does match the
description of the SLB in the architecture document, it is not
convenient either for looking up the SLB, or for
Currently the SLB information when emulating a PowerPC 970 is
storeed in a structure with the unhelpfully named fields 'tmp'
and 'tmp64'. While the layout in these fields does match the
description of the SLB in the architecture document, it is not
convenient either for looking up the SLB, or for
Currently the SLB information when emulating a PowerPC 970 is
storeed in a structure with the unhelpfully named fields 'tmp'
and 'tmp64'. While the layout in these fields does match the
description of the SLB in the architecture document, it is not
convenient either for looking up the SLB, or for