Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] PCI device assignment: improve error reporting over QMP

2014-05-07 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 05/07/14 15:52, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:48:13 +0200 > Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> Hi Luiz, >> >> On 04/10/14 10:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> This is for . >>> >>> In general, we want to propagate non-fatal (ie. non-exit()i

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] PCI device assignment: improve error reporting over QMP

2014-05-07 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:48:13 +0200 Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi Luiz, > > On 04/10/14 10:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > This is for . > > > > In general, we want to propagate non-fatal (ie. non-exit()ing, > > non-abort()ing) errors to the QMP caller,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] PCI device assignment: improve error reporting over QMP

2014-04-30 Thread Laszlo Ersek
Hi Luiz, On 04/10/14 10:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > This is for . > > In general, we want to propagate non-fatal (ie. non-exit()ing, > non-abort()ing) errors to the QMP caller, rather than printing them > on-site. The series focuses on errors rais

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] PCI device assignment: improve error reporting over QMP

2014-04-10 Thread Laszlo Ersek
This is for . In general, we want to propagate non-fatal (ie. non-exit()ing, non-abort()ing) errors to the QMP caller, rather than printing them on-site. The series focuses on errors raised at PCI assignment time (ie. reachable from assigned_init