On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 10:01 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> > > After this patch set, only load and store op helpers remain in
>> > > op_helper.c. I have some patches for those but they need more
>> > > thought.
>> >
>> > Have you benchmarked i
On 09/12/2011 10:01 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > After this patch set, only load and store op helpers remain in
> > op_helper.c. I have some patches for those but they need more thought.
>
> Have you benchmarked it?
Asking for a benchmark without full conversion is pointless.
Agreed. B
On 09/12/2011 07:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 03:29 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> After this patch set, only load and store op helpers remain in
>> op_helper.c. I have some patches for those but they need more thought.
>
> Have you benchmarked it?
Asking for a benchmark without full con
On 09/11/2011 03:29 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
After this patch set, only load and store op helpers remain in
op_helper.c. I have some patches for those but they need more thought.
Have you benchmarked it?
Paolo
After this patch set, only load and store op helpers remain in
op_helper.c. I have some patches for those but they need more thought.
I was too lazy to attach the patches. Instead, the patch set can be found in:
git://repo.or.cz/qemu/blueswirl.git
http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/blueswirl.git
Blue Swirl
