Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On 04/05/13 01:22, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:52:31AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 04/03/13 22:05, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Laszlo Ersek writes:
Any chance patches 01 to 09 could be considered? Esp. 06 which removes
an out-of-bounds access (an innocent-looki
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:52:31AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 04/03/13 22:05, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Laszlo Ersek writes:
> >> Any chance patches 01 to 09 could be considered? Esp. 06 which removes
> >> an out-of-bounds access (an innocent-looking one, admittedly).
> >>
> >> I'm OK too if
(adding Kevin)
On 04/03/13 22:05, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek writes:
>
>> On 03/21/13 00:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> This series reworks the internals of the -acpitable command line option,
>>> and if that option is not specified, produces the APIC (MADT) table
>>> inside qemu, to be
Laszlo Ersek writes:
> On 03/21/13 00:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> This series reworks the internals of the -acpitable command line option,
>> and if that option is not specified, produces the APIC (MADT) table
>> inside qemu, to be consumed over fw_cfg (alongside the DSDT).
>
>> Laszlo Ersek (11):
On 03/21/13 00:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> This series reworks the internals of the -acpitable command line option,
> and if that option is not specified, produces the APIC (MADT) table
> inside qemu, to be consumed over fw_cfg (alongside the DSDT).
> Laszlo Ersek (11):
> strip some whitespace
>
This series reworks the internals of the -acpitable command line option,
and if that option is not specified, produces the APIC (MADT) table
inside qemu, to be consumed over fw_cfg (alongside the DSDT).
checkpatch.pl raises quite a few complaints on the start-to-end diff of
this series, but all of
