On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:02:42 +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The motivation here is reducing the total overhead.
>
> Before a few patches went into target-arm.next, I measured total
> tlb flush overhead for aarch64 at 25%. This appears to reduce the
> total overhead to about 5% (I do need t
The motivation here is reducing the total overhead.
Before a few patches went into target-arm.next, I measured total
tlb flush overhead for aarch64 at 25%. This appears to reduce the
total overhead to about 5% (I do need to re-run the control tests,
not just watch perf top as I'm doing now).
The
