Hi,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:30:40AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Peter's recent userland syscall testing has encouraged me to clean
> up and re-submit some ages-old patches to enable userland testing
> of the other mips abis.
>
> Please review.
>
>
> r~
>
>
> Richard Henderson (10):
>
On 11 February 2013 16:10, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 07:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Well, just to start with, I looked at patch 1 and thought
>> "why is it ok to delete these without it making something
>> fail to compile?".
>
> Fair enough. Assume the replies I just sent will be i
On 2013-02-11 07:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
Well, just to start with, I looked at patch 1 and thought
"why is it ok to delete these without it making something
fail to compile?".
Fair enough. Assume the replies I just sent will be in the
next revision.
r~
On 11 February 2013 15:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 01:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Eight patches out of ten have no commit message beyond the
>> one-liner summary...
> Ok, so? Most of the patches are microscopic,
> and do exactly what the summary says.
Well, just to start with,
On 2013-02-11 01:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
Eight patches out of ten have no commit message beyond the
one-liner summary...
Ok, so? Most of the patches are microscopic,
and do exactly what the summary says.
r~
On 10 February 2013 18:30, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Peter's recent userland syscall testing has encouraged me to clean
> up and re-submit some ages-old patches to enable userland testing
> of the other mips abis.
>
> Please review.
Eight patches out of ten have no commit message beyond the
one-
Peter's recent userland syscall testing has encouraged me to clean
up and re-submit some ages-old patches to enable userland testing
of the other mips abis.
Please review.
r~
Richard Henderson (10):
mips-linux-user: Delete n32 and n64 signal stubs
mips-linux-user: Share o32 code for n32 an
