Am 30.08.2011 20:29, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
> On 30.08.2011, at 19:25, Stefan Weil wrote:
>
>> Am 30.08.2011 09:44, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
>>> Am 29.08.2011 21:55, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Am 29.08.2011 10:34, schrieb TeLeMan:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 28
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 30.08.2011, at 19:25, Stefan Weil wrote:
>
>> Am 30.08.2011 09:44, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
>>> Am 29.08.2011 21:55, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Am 29.08.2011 10:34, schrieb TeLeMan:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>
On 30.08.2011, at 19:25, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 30.08.2011 09:44, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
>> Am 29.08.2011 21:55, schrieb Stefan Weil:
>>> Am 29.08.2011 10:34, schrieb TeLeMan:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>
>> On Su
Am 30.08.2011 09:44, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 29.08.2011 21:55, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Am 29.08.2011 10:34, schrieb TeLeMan:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil
wrote:
These patches fix the pa
Am 29.08.2011 21:55, schrieb Stefan Weil:
> Am 29.08.2011 10:34, schrieb TeLeMan:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil
wrote:
>
> These patches fix the packing of stru
Am 29.08.2011 10:34, schrieb TeLeMan:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil
wrote:
These patches fix the packing of structures which were affected by
the new compiler attribute -mms-bitfields
Am 29.08.2011 um 10:34 schrieb TeLeMan :
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
These patches fix the packing of structures which were affected by
the new com
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:01, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>
>>> These patches fix the packing of structures which were affected by
>>> the new compiler attribute -mms-bitfields (which is needed for glib
Hi,
If a structure is only used internally by QEMU (not used in network,
disk or guest interfaces), changes in padding don't matter.
[PATCH 5/7] usb: Fix packing for w32: needs packing (usb interface)
Patch looks good (and is needed as the structs are part of the guest
interface).
chee
Am 28.08.2011 23:43, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
These patches fix the packing of structures which were affected by
the new compiler attribute -mms-bitfields (which is needed for glib-2.0).
I compiled qemu.exe with and without -mms-bitfields and comp
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> These patches fix the packing of structures which were affected by
> the new compiler attribute -mms-bitfields (which is needed for glib-2.0).
>
> I compiled qemu.exe with and without -mms-bitfields and compared
> the resulting struct alignment
These patches fix the packing of structures which were affected by
the new compiler attribute -mms-bitfields (which is needed for glib-2.0).
I compiled qemu.exe with and without -mms-bitfields and compared
the resulting struct alignment using pahole and codiff.
The patches are split for different
12 matches
Mail list logo