Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-07 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 07/11/2016 à 14:50, Peter Maydell a écrit : > On 7 November 2016 at 13:44, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> I know risu, I would like to port it to m68k but for the moment it's too >> much work. I think someone is already working on a port to PPC, perhaps >> after that it will be easier to port it to m

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 November 2016 at 13:44, Laurent Vivier wrote: > I know risu, I would like to port it to m68k but for the moment it's too > much work. I think someone is already working on a port to PPC, perhaps > after that it will be easier to port it to m68k. Yes, I have the ppc patchset on my review queu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-07 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 07/11/2016 à 14:12, Peter Maydell a écrit : > On 7 November 2016 at 12:24, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> If you want to have a try, this tree is based on tgt-m68k + what is >> needed to boot an etch-m68k container. >> >> git://github.com/vivier/qemu-m68k.git for-rth > > You could try using 'risu' t

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 November 2016 at 12:24, Laurent Vivier wrote: > If you want to have a try, this tree is based on tgt-m68k + what is > needed to boot an etch-m68k container. > > git://github.com/vivier/qemu-m68k.git for-rth You could try using 'risu' to do single-instruction level comprehensive testing, if y

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-07 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 07/11/2016 à 13:08, Richard Henderson a écrit : > On 11/06/2016 08:52 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> Richard Henderson (4): >>> target-m68k: Do not cpu_abort on undefined insns >>> target-m68k: Inline shifts >>> target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for registers >>> target-m68k: Implement

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-07 Thread Richard Henderson
On 11/06/2016 08:52 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: Richard Henderson (4): target-m68k: Do not cpu_abort on undefined insns target-m68k: Inline shifts target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for registers target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for memory There is something wrong with the bitfield pa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-06 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 06/11/2016 à 07:18, Richard Henderson a écrit : > I believe the first two patches have already been posted. > No changes there, but included here for completeness. > > Next is a proposed shift patch, with the changes I believe > I mentioned wanting during review. > > Finally, implementations o

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches

2016-11-05 Thread Richard Henderson
I believe the first two patches have already been posted. No changes there, but included here for completeness. Next is a proposed shift patch, with the changes I believe I mentioned wanting during review. Finally, implementations of the bitfield instructions. At least the register portion depen