On 07/13/2013 11:05 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> The -1 branch looks newer, but the -2 branch contains more code specific to
>> qemu. Both are over 2 years old, so I'm not sure what I was going for...
>
> There are now -3 and -4 branches...
>
> Wow, -4 is current with upstream I think? Cool, I'll t
On 07/10/2013 08:49:35 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 07/09/2013 10:43 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> Do you have a kernel .config that boots on this board? I'd really
like to try
> this out myself...
I haven't worked on this in quite some time. But I've located two
branches
that look like the
On 07/09/2013 10:43 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> Do you have a kernel .config that boots on this board? I'd really like to try
> this out myself...
I haven't worked on this in quite some time. But I've located two branches
that look like they might be the code corresponding to my image. Try
git:/
On 07/08/2013 08:01:08 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
The recent changes for ioport memory regions is a blessing and a
curse for the simplified alpha machine model we have.
On the one hand, we can eliminate two hacks present in the tsunami
system chip emulation. We also now get machine checks whe
The recent changes for ioport memory regions is a blessing and a
curse for the simplified alpha machine model we have.
On the one hand, we can eliminate two hacks present in the tsunami
system chip emulation. We also now get machine checks when we access
ioports that aren't connected to a device.
