On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:22:12AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/15/2014 08:10 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:00:19AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 08/15/2014 07:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>
> >>> We can choose Markus's suggestion of using the file name to guess the
> >>
Am 15.08.2014 um 16:00 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 08/15/2014 07:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> > We can choose Markus's suggestion of using the file name to guess the
> > format. I don't really like it much, but it seems like a fair compromise
> > that doesn't hurt usability as much.
>
> In o
On 08/15/2014 08:10 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:00:19AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 08/15/2014 07:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> We can choose Markus's suggestion of using the file name to guess the
>>> format. I don't really like it much, but it seems like a fair compromi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:00:19AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/15/2014 07:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> > We can choose Markus's suggestion of using the file name to guess the
> > format. I don't really like it much, but it seems like a fair compromise
> > that doesn't hurt usability as much.
On 08/15/2014 07:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> We can choose Markus's suggestion of using the file name to guess the
> format. I don't really like it much, but it seems like a fair compromise
> that doesn't hurt usability as much.
In other words, if a user gives a file a "known suffix", then it is
t
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:37:56PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 15.08.2014 um 14:14 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55:19PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wr
Am 15.08.2014 um 14:14 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55:19PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 07:13:07AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/15/2014 06:28 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
>
> > I worry that will subtly alter current behavior in bad ways. For
> > instance, take this image chain:
> >
> > qemu-img create -f qcow2 foo.img 1G
> > qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b f
On 08/15/2014 06:14 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
>
> And of course, convenience options like -hda spit out the deprecation
> warning - which I think is probably a good thing. Here is what I made
> it say:
>
> fprintf(stderr, "Format autodetection is deprecated and may be "
> "remove
On 08/15/2014 06:28 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> I worry that will subtly alter current behavior in bad ways. For
> instance, take this image chain:
>
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 foo.img 1G
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b foo.img bar.img 1G
>
> qemu-kvm -drive file=bar.img,format=qcow2
>
>
Jeff Cody writes:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:21:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Kevin Wolf writes:
>>
>> > Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
>> >> > On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:21:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> >> > > On Tue, Aug
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55:19PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Stefan
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, Aug 01,
Am 14.08.2014 um 16:57 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:39:58PM +0200, L
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM -0400, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:39:58PM +0200, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > > > Fixed size VPC images do not
On Tuesday, 12 August, 2014 3:35:42 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:39:58PM +0200, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > > Fixed size VPC images do not have a footer, hence the current probe
> > > function will fail and QEMU
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:39:58PM +0200, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > Fixed size VPC images do not have a footer, hence the current probe
> > function will fail and QEMU will fall back to the raw_bsd driver, which is
> > not the corre
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:39:58PM +0200, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> Fixed size VPC images do not have a footer, hence the current probe
> function will fail and QEMU will fall back to the raw_bsd driver, which is
> not the correct behaviour. The specification of the format says that fixed
> size imag
Fixed size VPC images do not have a footer, hence the current probe
function will fail and QEMU will fall back to the raw_bsd driver, which is
not the correct behaviour. The specification of the format says that fixed
size images have a footer as the last 512 bytes of the file. The footer is
exactl
20 matches
Mail list logo
