Am 19.02.2014 20:13, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:58:09AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> This is the approach I believe was agreed upon during the last QEMU
>> developers
>> conf call (sorry I didn't join, the meeting timezone change confused me).
>
> Yes.
Matches m
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:58:09AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This is the approach I believe was agreed upon during the last QEMU developers
> conf call (sorry I didn't join, the meeting timezone change confused me).
Yes.
> Some may notice that representing this new behavior using solely def
Il 19/02/2014 15:58, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
This is the approach I believe was agreed upon during the last QEMU developers
conf call (sorry I didn't join, the meeting timezone change confused me).
Yes, that's correct.
Some may notice that representing this new behavior using solely defau
This is the approach I believe was agreed upon during the last QEMU developers
conf call (sorry I didn't join, the meeting timezone change confused me).
Some may notice that representing this new behavior using solely default values
on CPU properties may be a little difficult. Making it possible t
