Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts

2016-03-19 Thread Markus Armbruster
Paolo Bonzini writes: > In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and > blockdev_auto_del. > > With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same > id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is delivered (which equals to > unrealize). > > I'm sorry I'm not able to e

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts

2016-03-09 Thread Markus Armbruster
Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 09.03.2016 um 13:20 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> On 22/02/2016 15:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and >> > blockdev_auto_del. >> > >> > With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same >> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts

2016-03-09 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 09.03.2016 um 13:20 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > On 22/02/2016 15:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and > > blockdev_auto_del. > > > > With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same > > id as soon as the DEVICE_DELE

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts

2016-03-09 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 22/02/2016 15:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and > blockdev_auto_del. > > With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same > id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is delivered (which equals to > unrealize). > > I'm s

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts

2016-02-22 Thread Paolo Bonzini
In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and blockdev_auto_del. With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is delivered (which equals to unrealize). I'm sorry I'm not able to explain the history (and probably do no